- Site Feedback
- IDEA Sites
- Digital Freedoms
- International Justice
- 2012 Presidential Debates Guide
- Asia Youth Forum
- Big Apple Cogers
- Debate Changing Europe
- Debate in the Neighborhood
- Debating and Producing Media
- Debating the Future of Youth in Africa and Europe
- Dialogue without borders
- Digital Debating Blog
- Free Speech Debate
- Global Youth Forum
- Global Debate and Public Policy Challenge
- International Public Policy Forum
- Online Mentoring
- Securing Liberty Series
- Youth and Sports Mega-Events
- League of Young Voters
Explore the Free Speech Debate sample tours
Submitted by Alex Helling on 4 September 2014
IDEA UK has been working with the Free Speech Debate a project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford run by Timothy Garton Ash for the last three years. Free Speech Debate is largely an online project run through freespeechdebate.com which explores the limits of freedom of speech and the threats to free speech in the internet age. IDEA UK runs a microsite freespeechdebate.idebate.org which has debatabase debates exploring these issues in depth with the cases both for and against restrictions on freedom of speech.
There are three very common justifications for restrictions on the freedom of speech; religion, privacy, and national security. Religion is perhaps the reason why people are most likely to be offended by free speech, their views are so deeply held that in some cases insults, or perceived insults, against a faith can lead to violence as seen by the reactions across the islamic world to the cartoons of the prophet Mohammed published in Denmark. In the interests of safety even many liberal states consider it best to limit freedom of speech when it concerns religion. Privacy is always a balancing act, almost everyone recognises a right to privacy but this right is in tension with freedom of speech and transparency. What about those that rely upon the media, how much privacy should they have? National Security on the other hand is not about individuals but about the state and no one would argue that the state does not need to keep some things secret. But because it secret national security often becomes a catch all to stop any free speech that may be perceived as being against the state and to clamp down on transparency.
Timothy Garton Ash has taken these three justifications for restrictions on the freedom of speech as a starting point for three sample tours of the content on Free Speech Debate. They take you through many of the most controversial cases involving freedom of speech over the last few years, and each has a place for several Debatabase debates.
You can find these tours on either the Free Speech Debate site or our own microsite:
The International Debate Education Association (IDEA) is a network of non-profit organisations that promote debate and youth engagement in over 50 countries throughout the world. Find out more about us.
OSF Information Program
The Open Society Foundations' Information Program works to increase access to knowledge, empower civil society groups and protect civil liberties in the digital environment. Find out more about the Program.